ELECTRIC BILLS IN PJM KEEP RISING

WE NEED REAL SOLUTIONS

67 million customers from the mid-Atlantic to the Midwest have seen electric bills rise repeatedly due to higher costs from regional grid operator PJM. Find out what’s gone wrong, and what’s needed to fix it

The Crisis

Repeated electricity bill hikes from grid operator PJM, and growing risk of blackouts

June 2025
June 2025

$16-$20/MONTH PJM BILL HIKE

PJM electricity capacity costs skyrocketed up $12.5 billion

June 2026
June 2026

ANOTHER PJM BILL HIKE

PJM capacity costs rose another $1.4 billion — which would have been worse without price caps

June 2027
June 2027

HIGH COSTS EXPECTED AGAIN

Capacity costs are projected to hit price caps again

June 2028
June 2028

MAJOR BILL HIKES LOOM

Capacity costs could hit $30 billion (without price caps)

WHAT’S GONE WRONG

Years of PJM inaction, data center demand, and power plant owner influence

Massive data center demand

Data centers use enormous amounts of electricity — sometimes the equivalent of an entire city. The massive spike in demand from proposed AI data centers has sent prices in the grid operator’s electricity capacity market through the roof. Data center demand added into PJM’s last three capacity auctions cost customers $21.3 billionwhich is 45% of the total regional capacity bill.

Lack of new energy supply

PJM has been poor at adding new energy resources and planning the grid upgrades to connect them. Year after year, the PJM region has brought on far less new generation relative to demand than other grids around the country — up to six times less every year.

The profits and clout of power plant owners

With high market prices and little new supply getting built, the fleet of current power plants are getting paid billions more without providing anything more in service. These companies enjoy huge influence inside PJM, while the 67 million electricity consumers in the PJM region have just 1.4% of the voter representation in PJM proceedings.

 

WHAT’S NEEDED NOW

States and PJM must enact solutions that will actually cut costs and strengthen reliability

Protect people from data center costs

Because PJM isn’t using its authority to protect ratepayers, every state needs to take action. This includes requiring data centers to face interruptions if they don’t bring their own new generation resources or battery storage, as well as creating a separate electricity rate class for large data centers to help ensure they pay their costs, as Illinois proposes through its POWER Act, and Ohio and Indiana have done as well. 

Connect new energy projects where there’s room on the grid now

PJM has a track record of taking 6+ years to interconnect a new resource, so states should take action too. States can direct generation owners to make use of existing unused transmission — called “surplus interconnection” — to connect new resources quickly. Virginia, Maryland, and Indiana are taking steps to do this already. 

Double-down on battery storage

Battery storage is flexible, far faster to market than a gas plant, fills critical power needs, and helps keep energy prices down, as Texas has shown. States in PJM can create policies to incentivize battery storage and move utilities to maximize its use.

Deploy new transmission technologies

PJM has been too slow to upgrade transmission to connect new resources, but states can direct utilities to implement grid-enhancing technologies (GETs) like Indiana, Ohio, and Virginia are already doing. In PJM, GETs could add 6,600 megawatts of new wind, solar, and storage projects by 2027, at a fraction of the cost of traditional network upgrades. 

Streamline siting and permitting for new clean energy

Today’s fragmented rules for siting and permitting have put up major barriers to adding new energy resources — canceling many projects. Statewide frameworks are needed to bring timeliness and clarity. States can look to Illinois for examples on how to lead on siting and permitting frameworks. Virginia has taken steps forward as well.

 

LOOKING FOR MORE INFO?

Contact info@forabettergrid.org and check out these additional resources.

Interconnection

PJM’s Speed to Power Problem, and How to Fix It

Interconnection

Reopening is Not Enough: Why PJM’s Interconnection Queue Still Needs Real Reform

Data Centers

CUB and NRDC: Fact Sheet on PJM Data Center Capacity Costs

Data Centers

CUB: How data centers are raising our bills in Illinois — and what we should do about it

Data Centers

A State Playbook for Managing Data Center-Driven Load Growth — Johns Hopkins University

Surplus Interconnection

Surplus Interconnection: A Tool to Immediately Deploy New Electricity Supply to Enhance Grid Reliability and Affordability

Surplus Interconnection

ReSISting a Resource Shortfall: Fixing PJM’s Surplus Interconnection Service (SIS) to Enable Battery Storage

Batteries

Lessons for PJM from Summer 2025 in Texas

Governance

States Newsroom: State lawmakers want to peel back the curtain at the nation’s biggest electrical grid operator